Jude Bellingham, Emre Can fume at Chelsea retaken penalty decision against Borussia Dortmund in Champions League

Chelsea have been awarded the penalty when the ball struck the arm of Dortmund’s Marius Wolf with the combination rating stage at 1-1.

Kai Havertz stepped as much as take the penalty and hit the submit because the goalkeeper dived the fallacious method.

Champions League

‘This might flip the whole lot round for them’ – Chelsea backed to kick on from ‘enormous’ win

5 HOURS AGO

However the referee ordered the penalty to be taken once more after the VAR noticed that the Dortmund participant who cleared the ball after it had rebounded off the submit was encroaching within the field.

A number of Chelsea gamers had gone too early however that made no distinction to the choice.

Bellingham was sad with the awarding of the penalty for handball, however extra so with the choice to permit it to be retaken.

“From the place I used to be it seemed like he was fairly shut and I’m unsure what extra he can do with the arms,” he advised BT Sport.

“It’s a yard or two away, however I don’t wish to get in bother.

“That in itself was disappointing and the very fact they’ve had a retake is a joke. For each penalty, particularly when he has such a gradual run-up, there’s going to be individuals encroaching into the field by a yard or so, however that’s the sport I suppose. He made the choice and we’ve to stay with it.”

Dortmund midfielder Emre Can mentioned he did not perceive the choice and the referee was “very dangerous”.

“We did not need to lose, however we misplaced due to the referee,” he advised Amazon Prime.

“Giving again the penalty to be retaken like that, how is it attainable? I do not perceive. The referee has been very dangerous at this time. The way in which he spoke to us was conceited.”

Former Manchester United defender Rio Ferdinand mentioned he was not a fan of the retake both.

“It’s a nasty rule,” he mentioned on BT Sport.

“I believe if all of you might be within the field it needs to be null and void and the penalty ought to stand. What was so fallacious earlier than when the principles have been earlier than? Virtually each participant was in there. I perceive it’s the rule and by the letter of the legislation he’s acquired it proper, however that doesn’t imply we’ve to agree it’s an excellent legislation.”

Dortmund supervisor Edin Terzic didn’t provide a lot criticism concerning the choice.

“I am liable for the efficiency of our group. I do not wish to speak concerning the referee. I believed it was a good name and a harsh choice however that is the way it goes.”

The win might show an enormous one for Chelsea as they appear to maintain their season going.

Their poor Premier League type has virtually actually price them a top-four place, however back-to-back wins this week have boosted under-pressure supervisor Graham Potter.

“The boys have been implausible, actually first half performed rather well, created some good alternatives,” Potter advised BT Sport.

“Delighted for them that they may get the win and nice for everyone right here. There was a implausible feeling within the dressing room, everybody’s delighted. We now have been by means of a tricky interval.

“This competitors means loads to us and we wished to progress to the final eight, which we’ve completed. Now it units us up for an excellent few weeks.

“It’s nice for the boys, two wins and two clear sheets. After a tricky interval, you get these generally in life, it’s what it’s, however it’s the way you reply and the gamers have been implausible.”

Chelsea play Leicester within the Premier League on Saturday.